In early 1988, the Egyptian press was inundated with articles and editorials about the controversial book al-Islam al-siyasi (Political Islam), published in Cairo in December of 1987 by Judge Muḥammad Saʿid al-ʿAshmawi. Only in the last two centuries has Islam been so available for redefinition, for repossession, for claims and counter-claims. The critical reception, both public and published, of al-ʿAshmawi’s al-Islam al-siyasi placed in relief this modern phenomenon, this terrifying and leveling conception of Islam as ‘up for grabs’. This article analyses a representative sampling of the most revealing and highly charged reviews by eminent scholars and journalists, including Jad al-Ḥaqq ʿAli Jad al-Ḥaqq (Shaykh al-Azhar), Fahmi Huwaydi, Faraj Foda, ʿAli al-Dali, and ʿAbd al-ʿAẓim Ramaḍan. Al-ʿAshmawi’s claim that Islam is not, never has been, and was never intended by God to be a religion dictating the political and legal infrastructure of Muslim society runs counter to centuries of Islamic thought and raises the stakes in the modern battle over the custody of Islam. What is so threatening about this book for some? For others, what is so welcome about it? In what ways does the critical response to this book reflect changing Egyptian attitudes about Islam? This article attempts to answer these questions and situates the key players in the debate around al-ʿAshmawi’s book within the wider debate over rethinking Islam in the modern world.
The Florentine Dominican Riccoldo da Monte Croce was a thirteenth-century missionary and apologist to Eastern Christianity and Islam, who travelled throughout the Middle East during a period in which the Latin Church was in ferment, challenged by the internal danger of heresy, and external threats from Mongols and Muslims. Yet, this essay places Riccoldo, whose life has been the subject of little extended study, particularly in English, at the end of a thirtyyear period of optimism and anti-crusade feroour in the West. Not only was Europe rediscovering Eastern Christianity, but there was hope of the possible conversion of both Mongols and Arabs to the Latin rite, or at least political alliances with the Mongols against the Muslim empires. The first part of Riccoldo’s journey was a pilgrimage to the Holy Land, where his faith and sense of mission were renewed. During the second, and longer part of his journey, Riccoldo encountered many people of different races—Turks, Kurds, Arabs and Mongols—and religions—Christians of all persuasions, Buddhists, and both Shiʿi and Sunni Muslims. While his initial impression of Muslim spirituality and ritual was positive, it is radically changed when, while in Baghdad, he witnessed the display of prisoners and booty resultins from the fall of Acre in 1291. Riccoldo’s subsequent crisis of faith called into question his belief in the providence of God, and would radically colour his understanding of the place of Islam in what he had heretofore perceived as ‘Christian history’. For Riccoldo, the fall of Acre would have to be answered from a Christian theological perspective, with lasting significance for the history of Muslim-Christian relations.