First § : IT IS ONLY AT A RELATIVELY late date that the Muslim holy space in Jerusalem came to be referred to as al-haram al-sharif (literally, the Noble Sacred Precinct or Restricted Enclosure, often translated as the Noble Sanctuary and usually simply referred to as the Haram). While the exact early history of this term is unclear, we know that it only became common in Ottoman times, when administrative order was established over all matters pertaining to the organization of the Muslim faith and the supervision of the holy places, for which the Ottomans took financial and architectural responsibility. Before the Ottomans, the space was usually called al-masjid al-aqsa (the Farthest Mosque), a term now reserved to the covered congregational space on the Haram, or masjid bayt al-maqdis (Mosque of the Holy City) or, even, like Mecca’s sanctuary, al-masjid al-haram.
This article, which is based upon seven years of anthropological field research in London, outlines the reasons why the so-called Rushdie Affair forced Muslims in Britain into a corner that was not of their own choosing. Ultimately, these reasons are based upon a trend, in the West, to reify Islam in an unwarranted manner. There are social forces, however, among Muslims as well as other believers, to overcome reification by new modes of coexistence which go well beyond theological dialogue. They are practice-based and often local in scale; yet, they do entail processes of action and rethinking which can respond to the fundamental sociological findings about pluralist community-building. The article concludes with an assessment of their variables of success.